One honest picture of a project's obligations.
Capital Governance is the shared record of what a financing owes and to whom. What is due, when it is due, and what closes it, held in one place for the developer, the funders and the facility agent. Everyone works from the same truth instead of trading spreadsheets.
Today these obligations live in spreadsheets and email.
On infrastructure and climate financings, every party keeps its own version of what is outstanding, and the versions drift apart. A condition one side counts as met is still open on another list. Drawdowns wait while people work out who has done what, and when a funder asks for the state of play, someone rebuilds a status pack by hand. Capital Governance replaces that with one register every party can trust.
One register, and each side gets the view it needs.
Every condition, covenant and reporting duty in one place, with each party seeing its own scope of the same records. Nothing is duplicated, and nothing is hidden from the people who are entitled to see it.
Every obligation in a project financing, in one register.
Conditions precedent, covenants, environmental and social commitments, drawdown conditions and reporting duties, held as one auditable record. For lenders and investors it is risk control: capital releases against conditions that are demonstrably met, and the state of a financing is provable at any moment rather than reconstructed after the fact.
The money going into infrastructure has outgrown the tools that govern it.
More money is moving into infrastructure through blended and climate finance, and the reporting that comes with it keeps growing. The obligations attached to that money are still handled by hand. Getting them wrong slows every drawdown and makes the health of a portfolio harder to prove.
See it on a real financing.
Fifteen minutes is enough to walk the register and the overview. Leave a few details and a request goes straight to the team.